Artículos | Contáctenos | Ubicación actual : | CAMBIAR LOCALIZACIÓN
Getlegal Logo
  • Entendiendo la Ley
  • Formularios y Guías
  • Directorio de Abogados
  • Sitios Afiliados
    • GetLegal Practice Builder
    • Injured Care
    • Fuente Legal
    • GetLegal TV
    • Fuente Legal TV
    • Abogado TV
  • Sobre Nosotras
  • Anunciar
Getlegal
Blog Home  »  In The News  »  Charting Change of Venue

Charting Change of Venue

Lea en español
By Kathleen Davies September 8, 2018

Charting Change of Venue

Recently, attorneys for President Trump’s former campaign manager, Paul Manafort, informed the judge in Manafort’s pending D.C. trial that they would seek a change of venue, although they did not yet know where they wanted the trial to be held. Such changes are not often granted due to the competing interests at stake.

“Venue” is another term for a case’s location, which is usually the place where the issue arose. However, a party may file a motion for a change of venue if the location is inconvenient or the parties or subject matter involved in the case are so notorious that a fair trial in that location is impossible (as Manafort’s lawyers have suggested in his case). Balanced against those interests is the principle that a case should be heard in and by the community most affected by the controversy. The conflicts are readily apparent; in 2015, the Boston Marathon bombing suspect, Dzokhar Tsarnaev, sought to have his case removed from a Boston courtroom on the grounds that most potential jurors in the Boston area had already made up their minds that Tsarnaev was guilty. The community was interested in the outcome of the case, but that very interest, Tsarnaev’s lawyers claimed, made a fair trial impossible. (The court denied the change of venue.) Sometimes, claims that publicity has damaged a defendant’s chance for a fair trial have been successful; for example, the trial of Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols, accused of bombing the Alfred P. Murrah building in Oklahoma City, was moved from Oklahoma to Colorado on those very grounds. The court ruled that the need for fairness outweighed the community’s interest in hearing the trial. Changes of venue remain relatively rare, although some courts have attempted to resolve the conflict in creative ways. In comedian Bill Cosby’s sexual assault trial, the judge ruled that venue would remain in Montgomery County, where the case was filed, but that jurors would be drawn from Allegheny County, on the other side of the state. It remains to be seen whether Manafort’s next trial will be moved or affected by the change of venue. It is also unclear whether a change of venue is always beneficial: McVeigh, Nichols and Cosby were all found guilty.

Kathleen Davies is a staff writer for GetLegal.com. She is a graduate of the University of Michigan Law School and has practiced law and taught legal writing and advocacy.

Categories: In The News

Tags: The U.S. Federal Court System

  • Entendiendo la Ley
  • Formularios y Guías
  • Directorio de Abogados
  • Sitios Afiliados
    • GetLegal Practice Builder
    • Injured Care
    • Fuente Legal
    • GetLegal TV
    • Fuente Legal TV
    • Abogado TV
  • Sobre Nosotras
  • Anunciar
Recent Tweets
GetLegal@GetLegalMany legal issues affect those who work in the sports and entertainment industry. Click this link to read more abou… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…5 hours ago25 February 2021
GetLegal@GetLegalFiling for bankruptcy gives you a fresh start after a financial setback. Learn more about bankruptcy law and how it… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…20 hours ago24 February 2021